- Name Meaning: "Two kinds of Teeth"
- Pronunciation: (Die-Met-Row-Dawn)
- Tallest Height: 6ft
- Longest Length: 11.5ft
- Weight: 550lbs
- Region: North America (USA; Arizona, Utah, Texas, Ohio, New Mexico/ Canada) Europe (Germany)
Dimetrodon is one of the most
recognizable prehistoric animals that is mistaken for a dinosaur. It looks like
a cross between a lizard and dog and has the teeth to match thus its name which
translates to, “Two shapes of Teeth.” Despite the fact that the popular culture
mistakes this animal for a member of Dinosauria, it had many features that
differentiate it from the dinosaurs including; Semi-Squat legs, a thin sail on
its back, and mammalian dentition. All these aspects and more make this a very
interesting animal, and one of the most common predators of North America and
Europe.
Art and Copyright belongs to Daniel Eskridge |
Dimetrodon lived during the period
known as the Early Permian, more specifically 295–272 million years ago, in a
wide range of the world. Fossils of the animal have been discovered in USA
(Texas, Oklahoma, Utah, Arizona, Ohio, New Mexico, and Arizona), recently distinguished in Canada and Europe
(Germany). The first instance of this animal’s discovery came about in the
1870s by esteemed Paleontologist, Edward Drinker Cope, after receiving the
initial specimens from an area of Texas called the Red Beds. Cope acquired the
material from collectors excavating the area, they were Swiss naturalist Jacob
Boll, geologist W. F. Cummins, and amateur paleontologist Charles Hazelius
Sternberg. Edward Drinker Cope sent his material to the American Museum of
Natural History while his rival, Othniel Charles Marsh, sent his Dimetrodon
material to the Walker Museum in Chicago (Now annexed to the Field Museum). The
list of valid species is long and consists of; D. angelensis, D. borealis, D. booneorum,
D. dollovianus, D. giganhomogenes, D. grandis, D. limbatus, D. loomisi, D. macrospondylus,
D. milleri, D. natalis, D. occidentalis, and D. teutonis. Michigan
Paleontologist, Ermine Cowles Case, completed a study on Dimetrodon in which he
named a great many species. He was granted funding from the American Museum of
Natural History to conduct this study, searching through the material that
Edward Drinker Cope had discovered and labeled Dimetrodon. Case found that many
of these finds were of new species. After Case’s study, new specimens of
Dimetrodon were discovered in other localities of the United States including
Utah, Arizona, and Ohio. The latest discovery was in 2001, when a new species
of Dimetrodon had been uncovered from the Thuringian Forest of Germany. This
new find extended the range of the Permian predator farther than had ever been
known. But this pays no homage to the raw power that Dimetrodon housed.
The conglomeration of Dimetrodon Species
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. milleri
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. natalis
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. grandis
Art and Copyright belongs to Conor Daly D. teutonis |
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. giganhomegenes
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. loomisi
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. angelensis
Art and Copyright belongs to Dmitry Bogdanov |
D. borealis
Art and Copyright belongs to Atrox1 on DeviantArt |
D. limbatus
Art and Copyright belongs to |
D. Grandis (Showing the correct placement of the skin across the spine)
Although Dimetrodon remains a very
unusual animal, it loses its uniqueness when compared with the other animals it
shared its environment with; Diplocaulus, Eryops, Ophiacodon, Edaphosaurus,
Xenacanthus, Diadectes, and many more. Since Dimetrodon would have lived in a
very swampy biome, it would likely have preyed upon amphibians and fish of the
lakes and streams of its environment. Theories have been proposed by Paleontologists,
Robert Bakker and Everett Olson, that Dimetrodon would have been an expert
hunter of these aquatic prey and may have been the reason the odd amphibian
Diplocaulus evolved its boomerang-shaped headgear; in order to make it difficult
for a predator such as Dimetrodon to swallow it whole.
Art and Copyright belongs to Geocities (These are the contemporaries of Dimetrodon) |
The anatomy of Dimetrodon is rather
odd as well, it showcases adaptations similar to both mammals and reptiles. The
skull of Dimetrodon is deep and compressed laterally. The skull has only one
pair of holes, called fenestrae, on either side of the skull which is a telltale
sign of the animal’s heritage; Dimetrodon was a Synapsid, an early
mammal-like-reptile and ancestor to modern mammals. Dimetrodon’s relatives
consist of; Sphenacodon, Secodontosaurus, and Cryptovenator. Dimetrodon was
also the ancestor of therapsids, another line of Mammal-like-reptiles that
eventually led to modern mammals. Dimetrodon teeth were another sign of its
relation to mammals; unlike most reptiles and amphibians it shared its
environment with, Dimetrodon’s teeth changed shape along the jawline. Canine
and incisor teeth were at the front of the jaws, and then smaller teeth lined
the rest of the jaw becoming smaller in size. All of the teeth of Dimetrodon
are serrated and would have helped hold on to and slice through struggling
prey.
Dimetrodon Skeletons, Note: The teeth |
One of the most obvious traits that
Dimetrodon had is its enormous sail. Along the vertebrae of the animal, a line
of tall and thin neural spines juts upwards. It is unknown whether or not the
animal truly had a span of skin covering the sail; however this is a very likely
hypothesis and has been in use for as long as Dimetrodon has been known to
science. The spines are compressed in a rectangular shape from the sides and on
many specimens, preserve a figure-eight shape in cross-section. On many
specimens, the spines stop at a certain point and start to point in odd directions. This coupled with
the fact that the points of the spine near their end bend sharply, suggests
that the sail of skin would only have reached a certain point and then stopped,
shortening the sail to be much smaller than usually portrayed. The exact use of
this spine, like the spine of most prehistoric animals, is unknown; however,
theories exist for its use. One such theory is that the sail could have helped
the animal warm up by facing the sun, or cool down by facing away from it. The
other, slightly more excepted theory, is that the sail might have been a sexual
display to help attract mates. Perhaps the animal could have fed blood into the
sail to change its color and help it attract more mates, but these are theories
that may never be tested due to the animal being extinct.
Copyright belongs to BBC: Walking with Prehistoric Monsters |
Works Cited:
"Dimetrodon." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2015.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimetrodon>.
"Dimetrodon - Enchanted Learning Software."
Dimetrodon - Enchanted Learning Software. Enchanted Learning, n.d. Web. 09 Dec.
2015.
<http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/dinos/Dimetrodon.shtml>.
"How Much Do You Know About Dimetrodon?" About.com
Education. About, n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2015.
<http://dinosaurs.about.com/od/typesofdinosaurs/ss/10-Facts-About-Dimetrodon.htm>.
"Dimetrodon." Dinopedia. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 09
Dec. 2015. <http://dinopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Dimetrodon>.
Gonzalez, Robbie. "All Together Now: DIMETRODON IS NOT
A DINOSAUR." Io9. Io9, n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2015.
<http://io9.com/all-together-now-dimetrodon-is-not-a-dinosaur-1580344011>.
Switek, Brian. "Sail-Backed Dimetrodon Had a Nasty
Bite." Phenomena SailBacked Dimetrodon Had a Nasty Bite Comments. National
Geographic, 07 Feb. 2014. Web. 09 Dec. 2015.
<http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/02/07/sail-backed-dimetrodon-had-a-nasty-bite/>.
"Canuckosaur! First Canadian 'dinosaur' Becomes
Dimetrodon Borealis." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 24 Nov. 2015. Web. 09
Dec. 2015.
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151124112849.htm>.
The short sail with exposed spines idea is wrong. It was a result of people who didn't read the paper fully, or didn't read it at all misunderstanding what it was describing. According to the paper only the very tips of some of the neural arches were a different texture and angled, probably healed injuries. The last illustration you have on this page, by Michael Screpnick, illustrates that.
ReplyDelete