-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Triceratops is undoubtedly one of the most well-known, and well-loved, members of Dinosauria. It is second only to its predator, Tyrannosaurus, and fits into the small niche of popular prehistoric animals, including; Stegosaurus, Brontosaurus, and Velociraptor. Triceratops is known far and wide due to its great fossil distribution and the intensive study of its fossil remains. Triceratops is a main staple in museums, right alongside Tyrannosaurus. However, there are definitely some parts of Triceratops that are not as they seem, and will remain a mystery sealed by the marching of time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Velociraptor, and Tyrannosaurus (Tom Parker; Tomozaurus) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Denver, Colorado 1898 (Wikimedia Creative Commons) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many of the specimens discovered show such variation that an incredibly long list of species began to pile up. In the 1930s, scientists started organizing these species by joining morphologically similar specimens together. This resulted in the list of; T. horridus, T. prorsus, T. brevicornus, T. elatus, T. calicornis, T. serratus, and T. flabellatus. In 1983, paleontologists, John Ostrom and Peter Wellnhofer, co-wrote a paper describing their theory suggesting the existence of only one species of Triceratops, T. horridus, making all the existing species synonyms (Ostrom, J. H.; Wellnhofer, 1986, pp. 111-158). All of the work done on the Triceratops skulls to decide what went to which species was looked into again by Catherine Forster, who hypothesized there were only two separate species consisting of T. horridus and T. prorsus (Forster, 1996, pp. 259-270). This latest phylogenetic organization has held up and is widely accepted to this day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops Reconstruction (Chris Masna) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops growth series (Museum of the Rockies) |
Triceratops’ fossil record does not stop there; however, as a controversy regarding a close cousin has erupted in recent years. Torosaurus is another ceratopsian dinosaur of the late Maastrichtian stage of the Cretaceous period (approx. 68-66 MYA) found across the Western Interior of North America (from Saskatchewan to southern Texas). It lived in the same time and place as Triceratops and, oddly enough, looked remarkably similar. The main difference between the two genera is Torosaurus’ skull was larger, longer, and had symmetrical perforations in the frill. Recent findings might suggest the two are one and the same. Paleontologists, John Scannella and Jack Horner, have presented a hypothesis suggesting since the bones making up the skulls of the two ceratopsians were metaplastic or ‘stretchy’, the skull would change shape as the animal aged. If this is the case and both animals lived in the same time and place and shared remarkably similar anatomical similarities, Jack Horner and John Scannella suggest Torosaurus is a specimen of Triceratops advanced in age past what we recognize as an adult Triceratops. Since the only evidence for synonymy is skull material, there has been debate over Horner and Scannella’s findings (Scannella, J.; Horner, J.R., 2010, pp. 1157–1168). In 2011, Andrew Farke disputed Scannella’s hypothesis by arguing the fossil record of both animals showcase specimens of Triceratops too mature to represent immature individuals and Torosaurus specimens too immature to represent an elder synonym of Triceratops (Farke AA, 2011, pp. PLoS ONE 6(1)). This debate has yet to conclude and further specimens are needed before it can be laid to rest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops and Tororsaurus skulls (Wikimedia Creative Commons) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Conspecific Combat (Fred Wierum; FredtheDinosaurMan) |
Triceratops can easily be considered the bison of the Cretaceous for more reasons than one. Triceratops sported three solid bony projections from its skull, two horns above the eyes, and one on the tip of its snout. It also sported a large curved beak like that of an eagle or parrot (Castro, 2016). The second most distinguishing feature of Triceratops, excluding the horns, is its solid bone frill sticking out from the back of the skull. Unlike nearly every other ceratopsian, Triceratops’ neck frill is solid bone and structurally strong. Some specimens have been found with triangular osteoderms, bone armor under the skin, on the edges of the frill. This may very well point to the idea that Triceratops, and only Triceratops, evolved its frill differently from other ceratopsians to include both display as well as defensive functions. All other ceratopsians posses holes of varying sizes and shapes in their frills, and some even bear preserved impressions of blood vessels, adding evidence the use of the frill as a display organ to each other and the world around them. Paleontologist, Andrew Farke, suggests Triceratops used its horns in conspecific and defensive ways as opposed to only display. Farke compared the skulls of Triceratops and Centrosaurus, a smaller earlier ceratopsian, to determine whether the frequency of lesions of the skulls pointed to use in fights. Triceratops’ skulls have a large solid frill and two forward facing horns, while Centrosaurus had open frills and a long upward pointing nasal horn. His study found that Triceratops skulls show substantial frequency of lesions to the squamosal bones, the lowest outward pointing part of the frill, where repeated combat between members of the same species would manifest these symptoms. Whereas the Centrosaurus skulls showed far less pathologies, or evidence of injury, in their skulls pointing to there use more as display organs than Triceratops (Farke, Wolff, & Tanke, 2009). The overprotective armor of Triceratops would account for why Tyrannosaurus, the top predator of Triceratops’ ecosystem, had such powerful bone crushing teeth.
 |
| Centrosaurus Combat Configuration vs. Triceratops Combat Configuration (Bill Parsons) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops skeleton (Wikimedia Creative Commons) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Triceratops’ physiology is simple to understand, the dentition consisted of 36-40 teeth packed closely together in batteries and their shape suggests an herbivorous lifestyle. Triceratops’ body was low-slung, and as such, it would have fed on palms, cycads, and ferns. Triceratops took the niche of the low-browser which put it out of competition with the animals of its environment. The animals in the ecosystem of Triceratops include; Tyrannosaurus, Acheroraptor, the newly discovered Dakotaraptor, Struthiomimus, Ankylosaurus, Thescelosaurus, Edmontosaurus, and Pachycephalosaurus (Pearson, Schaefer, Johnson, Nichols, & Hunter, 2002). Being so widespread across the continent, Triceratops would have lived in many different biomes like forests and open woodlands. The top predator of Triceratops and most animals in the Hell Creek Formation was likely Tyrannosaurus. Tyrannosaurus had especially adapted to take down well-armored prey like Triceratops and Ankylosaurus and found relative ease in taking down sick/dying, old, or young individuals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Tyrannosaurus Vs. Triceratops (Vlad Konstantinov; Swordlord3d) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Triceratops throughout the centuries (Pachyornis) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| Tyrannosaurus Meal (Julius Csotony) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Works Cited: Carpenter, K. (2007). Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Marsh, O.C. (1889b). Notice of gigantic horned Dinosauria from the Cretaceous. American Journal of Science. 38.
Ostrom, J. H.; Wellnhofer, P. (1986). The Munich specimen of Triceratops with a revision of the genus. Zitteliana. 14.
Forster, C. A. (1996). Species resolution in Triceratops: cladistic and morphometric approaches. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16(2), doi:10.1080/02724634.1996.10011313
Scannella, J.; Horner, J.R. (2010). Torosaurus Marsh, 1891, is Triceratops Marsh, 1889 (Ceratopsidae: Chasmosaurinae): synonymy through ontogeny. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 30 (4): 1157–1168. doi:10.1080/02724634.2010.483632.
Farke AA (2011) Anatomy and Taxonomic Status of the Chasmosaurine Ceratopsid Nedoceratops hatcheri from the Upper Cretaceous Lance Formation of Wyoming, U.S.A. PLoS ONE 6(1): e16196. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016196
Castro, J. (2016, March 16). Triceratops: Facts About the Three-Horned Dinosaur. Retrieved January 07, 2017, from http://www.livescience.com/24011-triceratops-facts.html
Farke, A. A., Wolff, E. D., & Tanke, D. H. (2009). Evidence of Combat in Triceratops. PLoS ONE, 4(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004252
Pearson, D. A., Schaefer, T., Johnson, K. R., Nichols, D. J.; Hunter, J.P. (2002). John H.; Johnson, Kirk R.; Nichols, Douglas J., eds. Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Hell Creek Formation in southwestern North Dakota and northwestern South Dakota. Geological Society of America Special Paper 361: The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the northern Great Plains: An Integrated continental record of the end of the Cretaceous, 145-167. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2361-2.145
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
